Tradução em português aqui.
It’s troubling when people misuse scripture to subordinate and repress women, and, conversely, to elevate men. The misunderstanding and misuse of 1 Corinthians 11:9 in this regard especially concerns me.
“… neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.” (1 Cor. 11:9).
Some Christians believe that this verse teaches that women were made solely to serve men, and that men do not have a reciprocal responsibility or obligation to help women.
They hold to this belief despite the fact that Jesus taught about sacrificial service and demonstrated this to his followers (Mark 10:45).
They hold to this belief despite the fact that Paul specifically told husbands they should act with loving care towards their wives (Eph. 5:25, 28-29; cf. Eph. 5:1-2).
The Context of Origin
The context of 1 Corinthians 11:9 is creation and origin. In particular, this verse alludes to the Genesis 2 creation account where we read that the woman in Eden was made from a part that was taken out of the first (hu)man’s body (Gen. 2:21-22).
Echoing this creation story, verse 9 is prefaced with:
“For man did not come from woman, but woman from man . . .” (1 Cor. 11:8).
The woman was made because the man couldn’t manage alone. It must have been a big job caring for the garden in Eden. The woman was made from a chunk or side taken out of the human’s body, so that they could then work together, side by side, and care for the garden which was a sacred space.
Aloneness vs Companionship and Mutuality
Genesis 2 does tell us that the first woman was created for the sake of the first man—to rescue him from being alone (Gen. 2:18). And this is what Paul refers to 1 Corinthians 11:9. He goes on, however, to provide more comprehensive statements about the relationship between men and women, in particular, about those who are “in the Lord.”
“Nevertheless (or, except that), in the Lord woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God” (1 Cor. 11:11-12, italics added).
Paul points out that, even though the first woman came from the first man (cf. Gen. 2:21-23), every other man has been born of a woman (cf. Gen 4:1). Paul’s statements in 1 Corinthians 11:11-12 negate the notion that a gender hierarchy or male priority must be read into the created order. In no way does he acknowledge that there is any significance in being made first for those who are “in the Lord” (cf. Mark 10:31).
The first woman in Eden was made to solve the problem of the first (hu)man’s aloneness, since then, however, men and women have been mutually dependent on each other.
“In the Lord”
1 Corinthians 11:8-9 must not be read as an isolated text. It must be read and understood within its context, which includes the verses that follow it, and it must be interpreted with an appreciation of what it means to be “in the Lord.”
In Galatians, Paul wrote that “in the Lord,” or, more precisely, “in Christ,” there is neither male and female (Gal. 3:28). When we are in Christ, we have a new identity; gender distinctions remain but they lose their social significance.
In Second Corinthians, Paul wrote that we are not to regard each other primarily “according to the flesh” because we are now “in Christ” and part of the New Creation (2 Cor. 5:16-17). Rather than regarding our brothers and sisters “according to the flesh,” we should regard them as “in the Lord” and we should “submit to one another out of reverence for Christ” (Eph. 5:21).
Service and submission is not the sole responsibility of women. All of us, women and men, are to serve one another (Gal. 5:13-14), submit to one another, and rescue one another from being alone. Mutuality, not hierarchy, is the New Creation paradigm.
“From now on, therefore, we regard no one according to the flesh. Even though we once regarded Christ according to the flesh, we regard him thus no longer. Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come. All this is from God …” (2 Cor. 5:16-18a).
 I’m not game to word it quite like this, but respected scholar Kenneth Bailey did when commenting on 1 Corinthians 11:9: “It was not Eve who was lonely, unable to manage and needed help. Instead, it was Adam who could not manage alone …”
Kenneth Bailey, Paul Through Mediterranean Eyes: Cultural Studies in 1 Corinthians (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2011), 310.
 The overall context of the entire passage of 1 Corinthians 11:2-16 is about origins and appropriate behaviour in corporate worship. It is not about marriage. More on this passage here.
 I suggest 1 Corinthians 11:3 also refers to origins. I understand the second phrase of this verse as meaning, “the origin (‘head’) of Eve (‘the woman’) is Adam (‘the man’).” More on the meaning of “head” in 1 Corinthians 11:3, here.
 “Neither male and female” is an allusion to Genesis 1:27c.
© Margaret Mowczko 2015
All Rights Reserved
You can support my work for as little as $3 USD a month.
Become a Patron!
Do women have a special obligation to be helpers?
The Chiasm in 1 Corinthians 11:2-16
All my articles on 1 Corinthians 11:2-16 are here.
Kenegdo: Is the woman in Genesis 2 subordinate, suitable, or similar to the man?
A Suitable Helper (Genesis 2:18-20)
Is a gender hierarchy implicit in the creation narrative of Genesis 2:4-25
Galatians 3:28: Our Identity in Christ and in the Church
Being “in” Christ
The Holy Spirit and Equality in the Book of Acts
More articles in the In a Nutshell Series