One subject that I keep mulling over is what it means to be a leader and have authority in the church. I saw a comment on a blog a couple of weeks ago where someone wrote that Jesus commissioned the twelve apostles to be the leaders of the church. This seems to be a typical understanding of the role of the Twelve, but something didn’t ring true when I read the comment. So I started to mentally scan the New Testament to see what Jesus actually said to his disciples.
Did Jesus ever use words like “lead” or “govern” when giving instructions to the Twelve? I can’t think of one example. Instead, Jesus mostly used words like “serve” and “witness” when he was giving his disciples their job description.
Jesus elaborated on the ministry of the Twelve (or Eleven.) He told them to preach (i.e. proclaim) that the kingdom was at hand (Matt. 10:7; Mark 3:14). He authorised them to cast out demons and cure diseases (Matt. 10:1, 8; Mark 3:15). He told them to make other disciples from all nations (not just Jewish disciples) by teaching and baptising (Matt. 28:18-20). He told them they would be his witnesses (e.g., Acts 1:8).
Furthermore, Jesus told Peter to feed and shepherd his sheep (John 21:15-17). Jesus uses the verb “shepherd” here. There is an allusion to leadership in this verb, as the noun “shepherd” was used for leaders in Old Testament times. Peter was commissioned and authorised to nurture Jesus’ “sheep”. Importantly, this commissioning was framed with love, and I doubt that Jesus had the usual style of leadership in mind.
Nowhere in the four Gospels does Jesus plainly tell the disciples that they have the authority to lead, govern, or organise his people, using any of the typical words for leadership. Moreover, Jesus warned his disciples against the usual kind of leadership (Matt. 20:25-28), and he warned them about accepting the titles and prestige often attached to leaders. These titles, and the honour that goes with them, are to be reserved for Jesus and the other members of the Trinity (Matt. 23:8-11; John 13:13).
The Twelve, as well as other disciples, were authorised by Jesus to preach, teach, heal, deliver. They were given authority over demons, but they were not given authority over people. The Twelve were even given authority to interpret Scripture and define Christian practice, that is, they could “permit and forbid.” (See Matthew 16:19.) But this same authority is given to the church as a whole (Matt. 18:18).
The apostles were essentially servants of Jesus and they were servants of people. The word that is often used in this context in the Greek New Testament is doulos, which more precisely means “slave” rather than “servant”. Importantly, any authority that the Twelve had, and that we have, is a delegated authority from Jesus to be his slaves and his agents. It is an authority to function in certain ministries in the name of Jesus, but it is not an authority over any capable, adult. Rather than having authority over another person, we are to be mutually submissive to one another (Eph. 5:21).
I am not saying that leading is wrong. Leading and pastoring, after all, are spiritual gifts, ministry gifts with no preference concerning the gender or race of the minister (Rom. 12:6-8; Eph. 4:11). Any organisation that consists of more than a dozen or so people needs some kind of leadership. But history has shown that the church’s emphasis (obsession?) and its practice of authority and leadership, which has often emulated the worldly models of authoritarianism and patriarchy, goes well beyond the bounds of what Jesus taught and demonstrated (John 13:13-17).
The paradigm of leadership and service that Jesus taught is still not well understood or universally practised in the church. I know that I haven’t fully grasped it yet. So it is a subject I will continue to mull over as I try to follow Jesus’ teaching and his example (John 13:15).
N.B. The Twelve are only infrequently referred to as apostles in the gospels: “only once in Matthew and Mark, not at all in John, and five times in Luke . . . Many scholars [e.g. W. Schmithals (1969:98-110)] in fact argue that Jesus did not at any time call the twelve ‘apostles’ during his lifetime.” This infrequent use has caused Kevin Giles to pose the question, “Did Luke introduce the title ‘apostle’ in his role as editor of the historical sources he used, or was it already there?” Patterns of Ministry Among the First Christians by Kevin Giles (Collins Dove, 1989),155 & 157.
 Jesus did not commission Judas to be a leader of the church.
 The Twelve are most often associated with being witnesses of Jesus, of his ministry, death and resurrection. (See Luke 24:48; John 15:27; Acts 1:8; 2:32; 4:20, 33ff; 5:32, 22:15, etc). Women, sadly, were not considered to credible witnesses in the first century. This is one reason why women were not included among the Twelve. More on this here.
 The frequent criticism of Jeremiah was that Israel’s shepherds (leaders) were careless and self-absorbed (Jer. 2:8; 12:10; 22:22; 23:1-4). God tells David that he is to shepherd (i.e. lead) his people: 2 Samuel 5:2; 7:7; 1 Chronicles 11:2.
 From Matthew 19:28, it seems that when Jesus renews everything there will be a new kind of ministry for the Twelve.
 Leadership in the New Testament church was usually shared by a group of people rather than a solo pastor.
Image credit: Lightstock photo ID 124524
Jesus’ Teaching on Leadership and Community in Matthew’s Gospel
Authority in the Church
Unity and Equality in Ministry (1 Corinthians 12)
Apostles in the New Testament Church
The Twelve Apostles were All Male
Are women pastors mentioned in the New Testament?
Shepherds and Harvest Workers – Matthew 9:36-38