Deacons in the Ephesian Church
(Other articles in this series are here.)
In one of the later New Testament letters is a passage about diakonoi that outlines their moral qualifications. The diakonoi of 1 Timothy 3:8ff may have been official deacons with a recognised position in the church. Whether the women mentioned in 1 Timothy 3:11 are female deacons or the wives of deacons is debated but, considering that up until the fourth century there was no separate word for female deacons (see footnote in Part 1), it is likely the female deacons were simply called “women” here to distinguish them from the male deacons.
Deacons likewise must be serious, not double-tongued, not indulging in much wine, not greedy for money; they must hold fast to the mystery of the faith with a clear conscience. And let them first be tested; then, if they prove themselves blameless, let them serve as deacons. Women likewise must be serious, not slanderers, but temperate, faithful in all things. Let deacons be married only once, and let them manage their children and their households well; for those who serve well as deacons gain a good standing for themselves and great boldness in the faith that is in Christ Jesus. 1 Timothy 3:8-13 NRSV
There are indications in the text that suggest these women were female deacons and not deacons’ wives. For instance, there is no specific mention of women or wives associated with the episkopoi (bishops or overseers) in 1 Timothy 3:1ff, but there are women or wives mentioned in association with the deacons. It doesn’t make sense that Paul would regard the moral requirements of the wives of male deacons to be worthy of mention, but not the moral requirements of wives of episkopoi. So the women in 1 Timothy 3:11 are most probably not deacons’ wives, but deacons themselves.
Furthermore, if deacons’ wives were intended, we might expect a definite article or a genitive pronoun in the Greek of 1 Timothy 3:11 which could be translated as “the wives” or “their wives” respectively. However, it is the use of the word “likewise” (hōsautōs) that indicates a distinct but similar group to the deacons in verses 8-10 is being addressed in verse 11. “Likewise” (hōsautōs) is found at the beginning of 1 Timothy 3:8 and 1 Timothy 3:11.
Lesly Massey writes that “likewise” is “customarily used to introduce the second and third entities in a series.” He suggests that the use of hōsautōs in 1 Timothy 3 “seems to place the three groups [episkopoi, deacons, and women] in categories of a similar nature.” That is, the people belonging to these three groups are involved in somewhat similar ministries and require similar qualifications. Taking the word “likewise” into account, we can see that verses 8-10 refer to male deacons, verse 11 specifically refers to female deacons, and verses 12-13 probably refer to both male and female deacons. This slight distinction between the qualifications of male and female deacons may indicate that there was already some slight distinction in roles also. In later centuries there would be a clear demarcation between the roles and ordination ceremonies of male and female deacons.
John Chrysostom weighed in on the debate about whether the women in 1 Timothy 3:11 were deacons. In his Homily 11 on 1 Timothy he wrote: “Some have thought that this is said of women generally, but it is not so, for why should [Paul] introduce anything about women to interfere with his subject? He is speaking of those who hold the rank of deaconesses.” In response to 1 Timothy 3:12, including the idiomatic phrase “a one-woman man” which some believe excludes women, he added “This must be understood therefore to [also] relate to deaconesses. For that order is necessary and useful and honourable in the Church . . .” Chrysostom may have had the deaconess Olympias, his close friend and patron, in mind when he wrote this.
Phoebe as Patron
The ministry of the deaconesses in Chrysostom’s time and the ministry of female diakonoi like Phoebe were somewhat similar in that women who were wealthy acted as benefactors for the church and for individual church members, and they hosted travelling ministers and fellow Christians in their homes. Paul specifically identified Phoebe as a prostatis, a word that can be translated as “patron” or “benefactor”, when he introduced her to the Roman church.
The noun prostatis occurs only once in the New Testament—in Romans 16:2. The masculine form of this word, prostatēs, does not occur at all; however, it is used of Jesus in 1 Clement 36:1 and 61:3 where Michael Holmes has translated it as “benefactor”. Older translators of First Clement have translated prostatēs into English as “champion”, “protector”, and “guardian”. Kevin Giles writes that “In either its masculine or feminine form it means literally ‘one who stands before.’ This meaning is never lost whether it be translated leader, president, protector or patron.” Furthermore, the related verb proistēmi is used in the New Testament in the context of church leadership (Rom. 12:8; 1 Thess. 5:12; 1 Tim. 5:17 cf. 1 Tim. 3:4, 12). Paul’s use of this verb may combine the senses of providing for and of leading. (More on this verb here.)
While Phoebe was some kind of leader in the church at Cenchrea, possibly the host and leader of a congregation that met in her home, it is unlikely that she was a leader of Paul. So the translation of prostatis as “patron” or “benefactor”, rather than “leader”, fits with what Paul says in Romans 16:2: that “she has been a benefactor of many and of myself as well.”
A prostatis (feminine) or prostatēs (masculine) was, without exception, an influential person in Roman society. When translating or commenting on prostatis in Romans 16:2, however, more mundane words such as “helper” have typically been used. James Dunn notes the bias against recognising Phoebe as an influential woman, and states, “The unwillingness of commentators to give prostatis its most natural and obvious sense of patron is most striking.” He adds that, unlike many modern readers, Paul’s original readers “were unlikely to think of Phoebe as other than a figure of significance whose wealth and influence had been put at the disposal of the church at Cenchrea.”
The practice of patronage flourished in the early Roman Empire and was an important and essential part of Roman society. Seneca even described it as “the chief bond of human society” (De Beneficiis 1.4.2). While the practice was informal and voluntary, there were certain social constraints and reciprocal obligations involving the client-patron relationship. These constraints and obligations were an extension of the honour-shame dynamic that pervaded Roman society, and the typical client-patron relationship was one of unequal power. A wealthy man or woman who made a generous donation to his or her city, community, guild, or to an individual, etc, was able to exercise considerable influence and power. Patrons expected loyalty, public support, as well as public praise that reinforced or elevated the patron’s level of honour, while conversely reinforcing the client’s lower level on the all-important and highly competitive “pecking order” of honour-shame.
Not every client-patron relationship, however, was between people of unequal rank and power. Paul was not without honour, yet he publicly acknowledged and praised Phoebe and other ministers, such as Stephanas, for the considerable help they had given to him and to the church (Rom. 16:1-2;1 Cor. 16:17-18).
Susan Mathew suggests, “Phoebe’s mission in relation to the community at Cenchreae may be the same as that of the house of Stephanas . . .” Stephanas and his household ministered to the church at Corinth, as well as to Paul personally. Similarly, Phoebe and her household may have been a base of ministry in Cenchrea. Paul may have been a guest in the homes of Stephanas and Phoebe and enjoyed their hospitality during his travels in Corinth, but both Stephanas and Phoebe also travelled. We know that Stephanas and two of his colleagues travelled from Corinth to Ephesus to visit Paul and serve him in his mission (1 Cor. 16:17). We saw in Part 3 that many deacons travelled as part of their ministry. Perhaps Stephanas, like Phoebe, was also a diakonos.
In the next instalment, I give a summary of the possible roles of Phoebe as deacon.
 The dating and authorship of First Timothy are debated, but it seems certain that First Timothy was written, at the latest, before 120. This is when Polycarp of Smyrna wrote his letter to the Philippians in which he alludes to First and Second Timothy. The Apostolic Fathers, Greek Texts and English Translations (3rd edition), Michael W. Holmes (ed.) (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007), 273. I do not rule out the likelihood that the apostle Paul is the author of First Timothy.
 The list of qualifications in 1 Timothy 3:1ff assumes that the episkopoi in Ephesus are male, and married, and have children, and have their own households to manage, but nowhere in the Greek New Testament does it state that the leadership of churches, or the role of overseer, is restricted to men only. More on the role of episkopoi here.
 Kevin Giles, Patterns of Ministry Among the First Christians (Sydney: Collins Dove Publishers, 1989), 53.
 Lesly Massey, Women and the New Testament: An Analysis of Scripture in the Light of New Testament Era Culture (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 1989), 61.
 Many scholars, both ancient and modern, provide similar lists with between three to five reasons for understanding that 1 Timothy 3:11 refers to female deacons. Each reason on its own is not particularly convincing, but the reasons together are compelling.
 John Chrysostom, “Homily 11 on First Timothy”, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Volume 13. Edited by Philip Schaff. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1889) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight.
 The Greek phrase mias gunaikas andra, usually translated as “a one-woman man”, is an idiom found on numerous sepulchral (gravesite) inscriptions celebrating the virtue of a surviving spouse who had not remarried. By noting that he (or she) was married only once, it suggests the virtue of extraordinary fidelity. Bauer/Danker, A Greek-English Lexicon, 292. The NRSV somewhat captures this meaning in their translation of this phrase as “married only once” in 1 Timothy 3:2, 12, and Titus 1:6 (cf. 1 Tim. 5:9). More on this idiom in Paul’s Qualifications for Church Leader:
 Chrysostom, “Homily 11 on First Timothy”.
 Olympias (c. 361–408) became a wealthy widow at the age of twenty-five, after only two years of marriage, at which point she devoted her life to the church. She was ordained as a deaconess at the age of thirty. Olympias was a loyal supporter and correspondent of Chrysostom, and many of their letters, written while Chrysostom was in exile, survive. Olympias built hospitals and an orphanage, and she became a deaconess-abbess of a monastery named Olympiades, which housed more than two hundred and fifty deaconesses and virgins.
Joan Cecelia Campbell, Phoebe: Patron and Emissary (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2009), 63; and Jeannine Olsen, Deacons and Deaconesses throughout the Centuries (St Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2005), 62. (More on Olympias here.)
 In the ninth-century uncial manuscripts F and G, the word prostatis (“patron”) is replaced by parastatis, a word that can be translated as “helper” or “assistant.” Parastatis is related to the verb paristēmi which Paul uses when he tells the Romans to assist Phoebe (Rom. 16:2). The overwhelming textual evidence indicates that prostatis (“patron”), not parastatis (“helper”), is the original word Paul used to describe Phoebe.
 Holmes, The Apostolic Fathers, 93 & 129.
 For example, Clement of Rome, “The First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians”, transl. Charles H. Hoole (1885), Early Christian Writings.
And Clement of Rome, “The First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians”, transl. J.B. Lightfoot (no date), Early Christian Writings.
 Giles, Patterns of Ministry, 36. The LSJ lexicon gives the following definitions of prostatēs: “one who stands before, front-rank man . . . leader, chief, especially of a democracy . . . generally, ruler . . . chief authors . . . administrator . . . president or presiding officer . . . one who stands before and protects, guardian, champion . . . patron . . .” Liddell/Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, Ninth Edition, 1526–27.
 James D.G. Dunn, Romans 9–16, Word Biblical Commentary, Vol 38B, (Dallas, TX: Word, 1988), 888.
 Dunn, Romans 9-16, 889.
 “Personal patronage was an essential means of acquiring access to goods, protection, or opportunities for employment and advancement. Not only was it essential—it was expected and publicized!” David deSilva, “Patronage and Reciprocity: The Context of Grace in the New Testament”, Ashland Theological Journal 31 (1999), 32.
 Quoted by deSilva in “Patronage and Reciprocity”, 33.
 Much of the information in this paragraph has been drawn from Carolyn Osiek, “Diakonos and Prostatis: Women’s Patronage in Early Christianity”, HTS Theological Studies 61 (1 & 2) (2005), 346-370. See also David deSilva, Honor, Patronage, Kinship and Purity: Unlocking New Testament Culture (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2000); and Bruce Winter, Seek the Welfare of the City: Christians as Benefactors and Citizens (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing, 1994)
 Susan Mathew, Women in the Greetings of Rom 16:1-16: A Study of Mutuality and Women’s Ministry in the Letter to the Romans (Durham University: Durham E-Theses, 2010), 119.
This article is adapted from chapter six of a paper submitted on the 6th of November 2014 entitled “The Roles of Diakonoi, Male and Female, in the Apostolic and Post-Apostolic Church (c. 40–120) with Special Reference to Phoebe of Cenchrea.”
The bibliography is here.
Some of the information in this series has been included in my newer essay, “What did Phoebe’s position and ministry as διάκονος of the church at Cenchrea involve?” in Deacons and Diakonia in Early Christianity: The First Two Centuries, Bart J. Koet, Edwina Murphy and Esko Ryökäs (eds) (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018), 91-102. (Mohr Siebeck; Google Books)
Phoebe: Deacon of the Church in Cenchrea
The First Century Church and the Ministry of Women
Part 1: Phoebe and the Ministry of Women
Part 2: Ancient Latin texts in which Phoebe is regarded as an official deacon
Part 3: Phoebe’s role in Paul’s mission to Spain
Part 4: Deacons in the Philippian Church and Phoebe
Part 5: Deacons in the Ephesian Church, and Phoebe as Patron
Part 6: Deacons and women in the Apostolic Fathers
Part 7: Summary and Conclusion
Olympias of Constantinople: Deaconess and Chrysostom’s Friend
7 Lessons in Ministry from the Ministry of Stephanas
Likewise women . . . Likewise husbands . . .
The First Century Church and the Ministry of Women
Believing Wives and Female Coworkers of the Apostles (1 Corinthians 9:5)
Diakon– Words in Major Greek Lexicons
Paul’s Qualifications for Church Leaders
The Role of Overseers in First-Century House Churches